To the Editor:
To prepare for the July 19 ICCSD school board special
election, the Save Hoover Committee asked board candidates: If you
are elected, will you support amending the long-term facilities plan to keep
Hoover Elementary School open? Two contrasting responses stood out.
Recognizing that the Hoover closure does not align with widely held
community values, J.P. Claussen favors amending the long-term facilities plan
to keep Hoover open. Claussen believes that the priorities of the ICCSD
should align with the priorities of the community, and he encourages the
district to listen to more voices as it moves forward with facilities planning.
Claussen wants to build district-wide community and trust.
Paul Roesler supports closing Hoover, citing his commitment to the
facilities plan. However, Roesler has advocated that Hoover close two years
earlier than planned—next spring—despite the complexities of closing a school and
despite the 2019 target date the facilities plan lays out. Roesler
has written: “If we are concerned
that a school closing is going to be a reason the bond is passed or not, why
not have that school closed so that it isn’t an issue in the 2017 vote?” Roesler
has now stated he would support a 2018 closure. His commitment to the plan’s
timeline, unlike his commitment to closing Hoover, seems unclear.
While Hoover is just one of many important issues, responses to the
Hoover question may still shed light on candidates' broader approaches to
community input, bridge-building, and trust.
No comments:
Post a Comment
The simplest way to comment is to choose "Name/URL" in the drop-down box, then just type in your name. You can leave the URL field blank. Comments are moderated to prevent spam, so your comment may not appear immediately.